On 19/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/11/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution > > > > > zip: > > > > > > > > > > xdocs/** > > > > > build-testing.xml > > > > > commons-logging-api.pom > > > > > doap_logging.rdf > > > > > PROPOSAL.html > > > > > STATUS.html > > > > > > > > > > Surely at least some of these belong in the distribution? > > > > > > > > > > My view is that the source distribution should contain everything that > > > is in SVN. > > > > I think the currently included files are fine. Not everything is relevant > > to downloaders. > > Depends why they are downloading ... maybe they don't have access to SVN. > > > PROPOSAL and STATUS are now extremely obsolete. Don't know if there is some > > rule about the original PROPOSAL doc being kept though. Certainly neither > > is relevant except to apache people.users. > > > > The doap file is just to keep the apache "project overview" page > > up-to-date. Not relevant to non-apache people. > > Yes, but it would not do any harm to include it. >
BTW, I've just noticed that the previous logging release 1.1 includes xdocs in the source archive (e.g. commons-logging-1.1-src.zip). It also include the doap file, and PROPOSAL, STATUS. > > As noted by Dennis, xdocs is available elsewhere, and api.pom was a > > temporary workaround that will not be necessary once 1.1.1 is out. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
