On 1/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things: > > 1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL. > 2) Including sites in downloads. > > If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site > included in the distribution, then things are very unhappy. > > Findbugs doesn't seem to be the same issue - it's LGPL, but the > reports don't appear to contain any LGPL JavaScript. > <snip/>
See Niall's effort at doing similar for Cobertura reports here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=609834 > Do we want to play it safe and either not include Cobertura (and other > reports with similar problems), or not have downloaded sites? <snap/> I chose the former for [scxml]. > Or keep > it as it is and make this something we have to look at on every RC > check? <snip/> We don't need another point of failure ;-) IMO, worth picking one of the two (or three) options above now (choice may not be the same for all components). -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
