On 2/1/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sebb a écrit : > > > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have > > >>> been > > >>> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon. > > >>> > > >>> What about preparing 1.2 release ? > > >>> > > >> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some > > >> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after > > >> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging > > >> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing > > >> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I > > >> think we should leave as is). > > >> > > >> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories > > >> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis > > >> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to > > >> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2 > > >> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC = > > >> RC approach so we can iterate to a final. > > >> > > >> Phil > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not > > > many). > > > > > > SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work > > > in progress? It does not compile (e.g. > > > org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not > > > included in the M2 build. > > > > It is part of a code base progressively integrated into [math]. For this > > version, the ode, estimation, geometry and optimization packages as well > > as a few classes from the random package have been moved from mantissa > > to [math]. What is left in the directory will be reduced further as > > other packages are included in future releases. The final leftover will > > be dropped. So this directory should be considered an internal base for > > developpers only, it is not part of the release. > > > > > > > > Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build? > > > > Yes. I'll update the pom file. > > > > > > > > It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN > > > (and on the web-site). > > > > Sure. Should we be consistent with some document shared accross all > > commons projects or should we write something ourselves ? I think we are > > similar to other projects, currently switching from maven 1 to maven 2. > > A number of components have "building" pages that are vaguely similar, > but I don't think theres consistency - if you want something to start > with I updated Commons IO's building page for maven2 recently: > > http://commons.apache.org/io/building.html > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/trunk/xdocs/building.xml >
We actually have such a page in [math] http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.html which needs to be updated. Add to release todo list :-( Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
