Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Phil Steitz a ?crit : > > The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two > > issues have been opened. > > > > I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable > > with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for > > MATH-195), but I don't want to do this preemptively without giving > > others the opportunity to weigh in. If others think these need to be > > addressed in 1.2, I will stop the VOTE and we can address them; > > otherwise I would prefer to proceed with the release when the VOTE > > closes, after marking the issues for 2.0. > > MATH-193 concerns minors issues that will be better handled as routine > maintenance will start again after the release.
That is fine with me. Sorry I couldn't get those in quicker -- you and Phil are too efficient. :) michael > MATH-195 seems an interesting approach to me, but really needs to be > discussed before being either accepted or rejected. Since changing from > checked to unchecked exception is an incompatible change, it cannot be > done before 1.2 release. > > Luc > > > > > I think the fixes in MATH-193 are valid, but not worth holding the > > release for. While I appreciate the feedback in MATH-193, I can't > > endorse any of the recommended changes, either because I disagree with > > them or for backward compatability issues. Other opinions welcome. > > > > Phil > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
