On 3/18/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Someone has regenerated Proxy's website and now the version says
> > > > "1.1-SNAPSHOT." There aren't many differences between the latest
> > > > release and the trunk, but there are some.
> > > >
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > Which brings me to ... how are the components' m2 sites deployed? :-)
> > >
> > > Theres no /distributionManagement/site in the effective pom, should
> there be?
> >
> >
> > Now we have a <commons.componentid> property in each component pom,
> > this is perhaps something we could put in commons-parent:
> >
> > <distributionManagement>
> > <site>
> > <id>people.apache.org</id>
> >
> <url>scp://people.apache.org/www/commons.apache.org/${commons.componentid}</url>
> > </site>
> > </distributionManagement>
> >
>
> <snip/>
>
> Makes sense, except ...
>
>
> <url>${commons.deployment.protocol}://people.apache.org/www/commons.apache.org/${commons.componentid}</url>
>
> ... please.
>
<snip/>
Oh, and I seem to have a <server> with id "apache-site" already
defined (don't know if thats a canonical name around here ...
unlikely).
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
