--- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > This brings us
> > back, however, to the question of whether
> [reflect]
> > should be resurrected. My personal feeling is
> that
> > the scope of [reflect] as repository for "stuff to
> > make it easier to work with java.lang.reflect" is
> so
> > small and has so much overlap with [lang], that
> it's
> > not really worth it. The namespace of
> > java.lang.reflect once again emphasizes that this
> > stuff is at best a subset of functionality that
> makes
> > sense in [lang].
>
> My point was not really about reviving [reflect],
> but taking the code
> from it. I believe that the code was actually quite
> good and covered a
> lot of corner cases before it went dormant.
>
Cool. I'll have a look; I think this puts most of us,
if not on the same page, at least in the same chapter.
Thanks!
-Matt
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
