--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > The generics branch should remove the
> deprecated
> > > code, and that will
> > > allow new growth to occur there. In fact, the
> > > generics branch could go
> > > further and properly separate the functor code
> and
> > > collections, which is
> > > the division that probably makes the most
> sense.
> >
> > To take this a step further, the current trunk
> could
> > move to a 4.x target, allowing the deprecations
> to be
> > removed. Then the generics branch would
> > coincidentally bring about a 5.x version. ;)
>
> Or we could release 3.3, and a 4.0 right after that
> that is exactly
> the same but without deprecations.
Sounds good.
>
> Tempting to do the same with Lang 2.4 -> 3.0 asap.
Once again, why not?
Can we get a general consensus on these plans, or do
we need a formal vote?
-Matt
>
> Hen
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
