On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:19 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Niall Pemberton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> P.S. Perhaps its a moot point in Lang's case since I guess the >> deprecated enum package has to be removed to move to a minimum of JDK >> 1.5. > > Do you mean that the removal of the enums would mean that we have to > change package names? > > Would class/interface removals necessitate a > package name change? I haven't really thought that through.
Perhaps not, neither had I Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
