On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, a reserved package name makes sense ("internal" is fine, and
> atleast a couple of Apache projects use it). If there aren't any
> objections, we should document this and start using the convention.

I'm really good with whatever everyone else likes.  No real issues
with either way we go on this one.  Just let me know and I'll follow
the guidelines. :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to