On 17/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2009-03-16, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Personally I think failing is good and we'll learn lots from it. I'd > > like to keep trunk until the consumer community indicate it's a pain > > point. > > > Right now it doesn't look as if any of the projects with many > dependees was affected. So the changes right now don't seem to hurt > to many unrelated projects. > > If a project isn't willing to adapt to the commons-lang changes, I'll > add a project for the 2.4 tag and make this project depend on it, OK? >
+1 > > For example making a lang-backcompat jar for enum and exceptions > > might be a better choice and getting projects to add a dependency on > > that in gump. > > > This works great for Ant built projects but doesn't work at all for > Maven built ones since those additional jars would never be used by > Maven unless they are listed in the POM. > > > Stefan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
