On 30/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2009-03-30, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Might it not be better to throw an Exception if methods are called out > > of sequence? > > > We are pretty inconsistent here. In general I agree it would be > better to throw an exception, but we seem to swallow other errors in > other classes.
In that case, why don't we fix the other classes? If we document the required behaviour (e.g. in the abstract i/o classes), then we can work towards making the code consistent. > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
