--- On Tue, 5/5/09, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote:
> From: Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org>
> Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
> To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 6:43 PM
> > I think its really important
> that [collections] has no dependencies. As part of that, I'd
> also suggest that [functor] shouldn't have dependencies.
> >
> > While I understand the arguments of just picking up
> another jar if your using it, of tools like maven, and of
> eating dog food, when push comes to shove, I believe that
> one of the core conceptual attributes of [collections] is
> that it stands alone. The list archives contains more
> detailed discussion on this for those wanting to hunt it
> down ;-)
> >
> > Given that I am removed from the coding aspects of
> this these days, I won't -1 any decisions on this. But I
> will register that I believe my position very strongly.
>
> I keep on saying that: let's use dependency in-lining
>
Using what strategy, Torsten?
-Matt
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
