Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote at Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009 03:27:
> +1 on the low level libraries having no dependencies. C+P is a fine > way to share - we just, as Torsten points out, need to use smart ways > of C+Ping. > > +1 to Stephen on backwards compat (which is probably surprising given > how much I argue with him on that subject). I think there is a basic agreement on this, but back now to functor. In this case it means more or less to include complete functor into collections just for sake of no dependency. So, why had been functor created at all? For a user of both components this is the worst case. Two identical but not compatible interfaces for most of the stuff. Therefore, either merge functor with collections (IIRC it was a spin off anyway) or make collections depending. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org