I have taken care of [CODEC-80].

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:37 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review
> 
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Julius Davies<juliusdav...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi, Niall,
> >
> > That's a nice Gaelic name you have there (my dad's name is Hywel Rhys).
> >
> > Thanks so much for RM'ing codec-1.4.  Here's some feedback for you!
> >
> >
> > Codec-1.4 will need the patches from CODEC-80 applied, since they fix
> > an annoying bug.
> >
> > I would also like to get a patch in for CODEC-59 (Add methods to
> > Base64 which work with String instead of byte[]), but I want to upload
> > a new patch.  Please ignore the one I uploaded on July 17th.  I'll
> > have my * real * patch for CODEC-59 uploaded around this time in 24
> > hours (11:00PM PDT).
> >
> > But it's not that important.  This whole CODEC-59 business can be
> > postponed for a 1.5 release, if ever.
> 
> I'm not a Codec developer, so I'm hoping one of them (Gary, Henri?)
> will review these and apply the patches as they see fit.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback
> 
> Niall
> 
> > yours,
> >
> > Julius
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:10 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 23/07/2009, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I have prepared a release candidate for Codec 1.4 available here:
> >>>
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/
> >>
> >> Sigs, hashes OK.
> >> N&L files look OK
> >>
> >> It's a bit confusing to have Ant, M1 and M2 build files present - are
> >> they all up to date?
> >>
> >> Builds and tests OK using M2 on Java 1.4.
> >> Did not try Ant or M1 builds.
> >>
> >>>  Site is available here:
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/site/
> >>>  (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to
> >>>  proper codec home)
> >>
> >> I cannot find any reference to the minimum Java version required.
> >>
> >> JUnit could be updated to 3.8.2 (assuming Java 1.4+)
> >>
> >>>  RAT Report:
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/site/rat-report.html
> >>>
> >>>  CLIRR Report:
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/site/clirr-report.html
> >>>
> >>>  Release Notes:
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/site/clirr-report.html
> >>>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >>>
> >>>  Feedback welcome.
> >>>
> >>>  Niall
> >>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > yours,
> >
> > Julius Davies
> > 250-592-2284 (Home)
> > 250-893-4579 (Mobile)
> > http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to