On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Numerical issues should not impinge on a computation this small. ... > Your usage appears to be in accord with the suggested usage, but have you > tried it with a tolerance of, say, 1e-3? This gives the same result: {(NaN); (NaN); (NaN)}
-- Axel Kramer http://code.google.com/p/symja --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
