Hi, Henrib wrote at Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 00:53:
> > > > Paul Benedict-2 wrote: >> >> ... >> Do you think this is beneficial to your users? >> ... >> > Who are JEXL users today? http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-jexl/commons-jexl/1.1 Most prominent: Maven 1, ServiceMix and commons-scxml. However, there are enough projects using older versions: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-jexl/commons-jexl/1.0 Most interesting for us: commons-jelly. > Is it better for them to be one compilation away > with no code change (based on known cases) or would they rather continue > using an obsolete version? Well, what do you do if you use commons-jelly, commons-scxml and commons-jexl in combination? > I'm a biased user and see Jexl as a coding "glue" convenient for dev teams > and the compilation option suits me well. I also don't know how many > active projects still use JEXL (besides Commons Configuration); its > community is not very vocal... Thus the question trying to get other > active users opinion. :-) The question is, if it is a drop-in replacement. If not, you may not be able to use the new version due to transitive deps. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
