Jörg Schaible wrote:

> Phil Steitz wrote:
> 
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Phil,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.4 (JDBC 4) version:
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1/site
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.4-rc1/maven
>>>>>>>>> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_1_4_RC1/
>>>>>>>> Builds from source and runs tests with IcedTea6 1.6.2, Sun JDK 1.6
>>>>>>>> and Sun JDK 1.7.0.0.alpha69 (add to README.txt ?!?). However it
>>>>>>>> fails with IBM 1.6.0.6:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ========================== %< ================================
>>>>>>>>
>>>> 
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Test set:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource
>>>>>>>>
>>>> 
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Tests run: 46, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>>>>>> 3.398 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>>
>>>> 
> 
testReallyClose(org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource)
>>>>>>>> Time elapsed: 0.066 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>>>>>>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expecting SQLException -
>>>>>>>> XAResources orphaned
>>>>>>>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>> 
> 
org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed.TestBasicManagedDataSource.testReallyClose(TestBasicManagedDataSource.java:72)
>>>>>>> I could use some help debugging this one.  I do not have the JDK to
>>>>>>> test with and the failure makes no sense to me.  Does it happen
>>>>>>> every time?
>>>>>> It seems it was caused by a difference in the WeakReference
>>>>>> implementation. The DelegactingConnection returned the same hashCode
>>>>>> than the inner connection. However, both instances were kept in the
>>>>>> registry in xaReference (a WeakMap).
>>> 
>>> Need to figure out why that is happening.  This could be a test bug.
>>>  The connection should only be added once to the registry.
>>> 
>>>  After using a distinguishable hashCode, the
>>>>>> test succeeds also with IBM JDK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally I dropped the JDK 1.4 deps from the POM.
>>> 
>>> That is OK for the trunk POM.  Thanks.
>>>>>> I'll look into DBCP 1.3 ASAP - it got too late now ;-)
>>>>> Guess it was really too late yesterday. While
>>>>> TestBasicManagedDataSource works now, my change borked the
>>>>> TestManagedDataSourceInTx tests (interestingly 33 with Sun JDK, but
>>>>> only 28 with IBM). Basically my change broke the contract with
>>>>> hashCode that should be the same for "equal" objects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Question is now, what to do. If we revert the change, the IBM JDK is
>>>>> broken and it fails to release the transactions. Otherwise we have to
>>>>> change additionally the equals method, so that a DelegatingConnection
>>>>> is not equal to the wrapped Connection. However, this may case even
>>>>> more hick-ups.
>>>> I've reverted the hashCode change for now that brings back the IBM JDK
>>>> problem. :-/
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Jorg.  I think changing equals is not a good idea.  Thanks
>>> again for your help.
>>> 
>> 
>> This is a test bug.  The test is manually registering the connection
>>  after the LocalXAConnectionFactory has already done it.  Fixing
>> now.  This should eliminate the problem.
> 
> The funny thing is that on Sun JDK registering the ManagedConnection
> itself will update the entry in the WeakHashMap of the delegated
> connection. On IBM JDK a new entry is created in the map. Later on is the
> ManagedConnection removed, but the lookup will now return the delegated
> connection (may be because of equality of the connection and its hash code
> when it is used as key.

IBM JDK 1.6 tested - runs fine now.

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to