Thanks Donald for pushing it! I'm not a commons guy, but I wait desperately for getting the agimatec stuff over to apache (already using it in a productive project).
What about the package names? org.apache.commons.validator or e.g. org.apache.openvalidator ? It would be nice to know where the ride goes too, because I'm not very excited if we would have to refactor the whole code over and over again. txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/22/10, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote: > From: Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation > To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>, > priv...@commons.apache.org > Date: Friday, January 22, 2010, 3:44 AM > Since the proposal discussion on > Incubator didn't lead to a conclusion > on whether this should be an IP Clearance by Commons or a > podling for an > existing project (which is now dormant) I would like your > consideration > of allowing us to update the proposal to be sponsored by > the Incubator > PMC and we'll revisit where the podling lands at graduation > time. > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal > > > Thanks, > Donald > > > On 12/1/09 2:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Is the voting complete? If so, can you post > the Results to the dev list, so > >> we can start discussing the proposal on the > incubator@ list? > > > > http://markmail.org/message/m6a5hfdunoxkox6n > > > > Niall > > > >> Thanks for driving this! > >> -Donald > >> > >> > >> Niall Pemberton wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar > <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Niall > Pemberton > >>>> <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> <snip/> > >>>>> > >>>>> [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it > >>>>> [ ] -1 No because... > >>>>> > >>>> <snap/> > >>>>> > >>>>> In order to make it easier for commons > to *observe* the incubation > >>>>> effort does anyone object to > discussion taking place on d...@commons > >>>>> rather than a separate list and > commits going to comm...@commons? > >>>>> > >>>>> [X] +1 Use the Commons mailing lists > >>>>> [ ] -1 Bad idea because... > >>>>> > >>>> <snip/> > >>>> > >>>> You mention using comm...@commons here but > the proposal on the > >>>> Incubator wiki suggests a commits list > will be created (perhaps that > >>>> bit needs to be updated?) > >>> > >>> Good catch I've updated the proposal. > >>> > >>> Niall > >>> > >>>> -Rahul > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
