--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:30 AM
To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 24/02/2010 09:05, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Henri Yandell<flame...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Bill Barker<billwbar...@verizon.net>
wrote:
--------------------------------------------------
From: "jean-frederic clere"<jfcl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:48 PM
To:<dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
previous RC1 proposal.
RC2 Release is here:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
Tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/
If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag will
be copied to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2 and released as such.
---------------
[X] +1 I support this release
Ok, so we have three people listed as developers for this project
approving
the release, including the author of the three remaining disputed
files. Can
we get a couple more votes, to actually release this?
Is the objection to the -1 that the files should never contain the AL
header, or is the objection that it shouldn't be a release blocker?
Scratch that - I see that the files have had headers added by Bill.
Sebb - I don't think this is a release blocker. The three Makefiles
are pretty piddly, and it's fixed for a subsequent version. Wondering
if you can reconsider on your -1.
It doesn't matter. Releases can not be vetoed. Period.
At my count this release has three +1 votes and one -1 vote. That is
sufficient for a release. It is up to the release manager to decide if the
issues raised by the -1 vote are sufficient to stop the release or if they
want to go ahead with the release. Unless I have completely misunderstood
Mladen's views, he wants to go ahead with this and he now has the votes to
do so.
yes, but as I've stated before, my vote doesn't count (only PMC member's
votes count, and I'm only a commiter to commons). It still needs at least
one more binding +1 to pass.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
