----- "Bill Barker" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Currently StatUtils.sum(double []) (as well as most other statistics > that > operate on arrays) returns NaN on a zero length array. As pointed out > in > the Jira issue, this is not the conventional treatment of a summation > over > the empty set (which would return zero) in the mathematical world. I > would > definitely want to change this in 3.0. But I'm on the fence for how > much of > an incompatible change this would be for 2.2.
I would say go for it, but I'm quite loosy on compatibility issues (i.e. I promote compatibility, but always find good reasons to not do it). Luc > > The change is simple, and I'm volunteering to do the work. I just > wanted to > ping the list for opinions on how much breakage we can allow in 2.2. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
