folks, please keep on voting.
There are a few projects eager to use beta.3 or however it's gonna be named as
long it's not a SNAPSHOT :)
txs and LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:14:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
>
> maybe we can ask Henri and Sebb to push a commons-lang-3.0-pre-1 release?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
> > To: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:35:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading commons-lang
> >
> > I have no problems with using snapshots during development but IMO we
> > can't
>
> >release with snapshot dependencies. Do you have any concrete info on when
>the
>
> >commons-lang release might be?
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> > On Jul 28, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> >
> > > Commons-Lang 3.0-SNAPSHOT was published yesterday. Its APIs have been
> >updated for generics and varargs, and because its Maven artifactId and
> >java
> >package names have been changed, the upgrade path is a painless one.
> >Additionally, and most importantly to me at present, lang3 has a TypeUtils
> >class that can replace and augment bval-jsr303's existing TypeUtils class.
> >
>I
>
> >would say that in all likelihood lang 3.0 will be released before bval
> >1.0.
>I
>
> >would think the upgrade would be more a question of 'when' rather than
>'if'...
>
> >how would you all feel about allowing snapshot dependencies for
>0.x-incubating
>
> >releases after 0.2-incubating?
> > >
> > > Matt
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
