On 6 October 2010 12:53, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > So it's not a blocker then if we want to release?
No, I don't think it's a blocker, though we probably need to make the restrictions clearer. But of course it would be nice to have a solution ... > On Oct 6, 2010 7:21 AM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 6 October 2010 10:36, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >>>> >>>> I don't know if there is a workround. >>>> >>> >>> Is this something new? Did previous versions of exec pass these tests >>> on OpenVMS? >> >> No, not as far as I recall. >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
