It's +1 (binding) from me (unless Niall want to document the findbugs issues in 
the readme or someplace else.)

Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com  



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 13:11
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC5
> 
> Sebb has previously raised issues highlighted by FindBugs and I ran it
> before cutting RC5. We have resolved a number of FindBugs issues in
> this release (Commons IO 1.4 flagged 13 issues and 2.0-RC5 has 9),
> some of them are not issues and the rest we decided not to resolve. Of
> the 9 FindBugs issues 6 are pre-existing ones that were in the
> previous 1.4 release and 3 are new in this release.
> 
> On the new issues raised:
> 
> 1) FileEntry.setChildren(FileEntry[]) may expose internal
> representation by storing an externally mutable object
> This impl. is used internally by FileAlterationObserver to refresh and
> update the state of files it is monitoring and in that context this is
> not an issue. If people re-use that impl. elsewhere then they need to
> take care - but its not its primary purpose here and I think its OK.
> 2) The ByteArrayOutputStream "synchronization" issue is a false
> positive and was discussed here:
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-214
> 3) The ByteArrayOutputStream "may fail to close stream" issue is a
> false positive since close() does nothing in that impl
> 
> On the pre-existing issues from IO 1.4:
> 
> 1) The two issues regarding FileUtils ignoring the exceptional return
> from setLastModified() were discussed here:
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-215
> 2) The two issues regarding FileUtils ignoring the exceptional return
> from mkdirs() are false positives IMO since the following line in both
> those methods checks for the existence of the directory and throws an
> exception if it doesn't exist.
> 3) DeferredFileOutputStream is reporting one bug - but no details are
> given in the report!!
> 4) LockableFileWriter ignoring the exceptional return value delete()
> was discussed here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-216
> 
> So in summary we resolved 7 FindBugs issues that were present in the
> last release. 3 new ones introduced in this release, but which are not
> an issue IMO and the remaining 6 issue from the last release have been
> considered. So I don't believe anything here should delay the 2.0
> release.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Niall
> 
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Gary Gregory
> <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I downloaded and tested building on Oracle Java 1.6.0_21 64 bit on Windows
> Vista 64 bit with Ant 1.8.1 and Maven 2.2.1. All is well with the build and
> unit tests.
> >
> > Findbugs is not part of the build, so I added it and I have some questions:
> >
> > (1) doCopyDirectory and another methods that call setLastModified.
> >
> > In:
> >
> > private static void doCopyDirectory(File srcDir, File destDir, FileFilter
> filter,
> >            boolean preserveFileDate, List<String> exclusionList) throws
> IOException {
> > ...
> >        // Do this last, as the above has probably affected directory
> metadata
> >        if (preserveFileDate) {
> >            destDir.setLastModified(srcDir.lastModified());
> >        }
> >    }
> >
> >
> > Yields:
> >
> > FileUtils.java:1101 org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.doCopyDirectory(File,
> File, FileFilter, boolean, List) ignores exceptional return value of
> java.io.File.setLastModified(long)
> >
> > Since the caller specifically asks for /preserveFileDate/ I would assume
> that the cares whether it worked or not. Otherwise this should be
> "quietlyTryToPreserveFileDate"
> >
> > It seems like the method should either return a Boolean or throw an
> exception.
> >
> > Same issue with:
> >
> > FileUtils.java:827 org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.doCopyFile(File, File,
> boolean) ignores exceptional return value of
> java.io.File.setLastModified(long)
> >
> > Same kind of issue with:
> >
> > FileUtils.java:2060
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.moveDirectoryToDirectory(File, File, boolean)
> ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.mkdirs()
> > FileUtils.java:2135
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.moveFileToDirectory(File, File, boolean)
> ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.mkdirs()
> >
> > There are a couple more that I am looking at...
> >
> > -
> > Gary Gregory
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Simone Tripodi [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 01:17
> >> To: Commons Developers List
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC5
> >>
> >> Hi Niall,
> >> should the clirr report link located on
> >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/site/clirr-report.html
> >> instead of http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/clirr-
> report.html?
> >>
> >> I can't speak about the implementation stuff because my knowledge on
> >> IO is not good enough, but release looks good, mvn stuff are ok,
> >> generated site (known broken links a part) seems ok.
> >> Tested with both java5 and java6:
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Darwin Simones-Computer-2.local 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0:
> >> Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
> >>
> >> java version "1.6.0_20"
> >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065)
> >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode)
> >>
> >> Apache Maven 3.0 (r1004208; 2010-10-04 13:50:56+0200)
> >> Java version: 1.6.0_20
> >> Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
> >> OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "x86_64" Family: "mac"
> >>
> >> Tests run: 744, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Darwin Simones-Computer-2.local 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0:
> >> Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
> >>
> >> java version "1.5.0_24"
> >> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> >> 1.5.0_24-b02-357-10M3065)
> >> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_24-149, mixed mode, sharing)
> >>
> >> Apache Maven 3.0 (r1004208; 2010-10-04 13:50:56+0200)
> >> Java version: 1.5.0_24
> >> Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5.0/Home
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
> >> OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "i386" Family: "unix"
> >>
> >> Tests run: 744, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> >>
> >> I don't know if my vote is binding or not, BTW I express my +1
> >> Have a nice day,
> >> Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Niall Pemberton
> >> <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> >> > rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> >> > FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
> >> >
> >> > The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing
> >> > intermittent failures in Gump & Continuum and JavaDoc improvements.
> >> > For details about Continuum builds/failures, see:
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0/IOFailures.html
> >> >
> >> > The distro is here:
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/
> >> >
> >> > Release Notes:
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >> >
> >> > Site:
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/site/
> >> >
> >> > Maven Stuff:
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/maven/
> >> >
> >> > Some Notes:
> >> >
> >> > * There is one error on the clirr report - which is a false positive
> >> > (a generic method that is erased)
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/clirr-report.html
> >> > * Links to the JavaDoc versions on the site don't work (they will when
> >> > its deployed to the right location)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Niall
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to