On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:36 AM, James Carman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> As alternative: Can't we simply raise the minimum JDK level for VFS to 1.5 >> also? >> > > +1! Quit living in the past. Of course, we then have to discuss the > package name (and thus artifact id) change. :) >
It seems we had that discussion before and agreed it was OK to jump to Java 5. http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg11705.html. I guess it was never formally done. I had planned on doing some refactoring that I quess I never got around to. Note that the minimum version for 1.0 was 1.3. Whoever started 2.0 changed the minimum version to 1.4. If package names change it will require a bit of work. I'm not sure there is anyone using 1.0. All the questions on the dev list have been for 2.0 for quite some time. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
