Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Moved from user's list. > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Hi Ralph, >> >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean Jorg. VFS is an optional dependency so the >>> Java 5 requirement isn't an issue (although the doc probably needs to be >>> updated) and none of the changes made to VFS of late have had much of an >>> impact on Configuration. I've checked several times. >> >> ??? > > I have no idea how you got the below but you did something wrong. All > these were changed in r1034667. OK, sorry, I did not update my local copy first. [snip] >> To release CC you have to build it and this means now Java 5. It does not >> matter here if this is an optional dependency. BTW: It cannot build >> against vfs 2.0-SNAPSHOT - you're using the old package name. > > I use a Java 6 compiler, but Configuration's pom.xml is configured to > require Java 1.4. If there were any problems they would have showed up > when I built Commons Configuration after the package was changed. There > would only be a problem if Configuration was using something in the VFS > API that was exposing something from Java 5. OK, but as said, you have to use at least a Java 5 compiler for the build. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
