I guess there are some other logical alternatives to consider:

1) s/2.2/3.0  s/3.0/4.0
2) abandon 2.2 release

Option 1) may not be that bad - saves work reverting the incompatible
stuff remaining and solves Luc's (and anyone else who has been using
trunk/2_X) problem and also keeps us consistent with Commons
guidelines.  Option 1) looks distasteful, but could result in 3.0
being released sooner.

My personal preference is

0) revert incompatible changes other than those required to fix bugs
and then proceed with 2.2 release

Phil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to