On 27 January 2011 08:45, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > In the light of LANG-577, I wondered if the mutable package is still > necessary looking at the concurrent stuff of the JDK. I tried once to start > a discussion about it > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/112282), but got > no response.
The mutable classes cover a broader range of stuff than the JDK Atomic* classes. And are a useful element in their own right. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
