On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think "tuple" is a better package name. In geo-coordinates, I don't think > it's proper to call Longtitude a key and Latitude a value. It's just a tuple > of values. Same thing for 3d dimension space, etc. > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Stephen Colebourne >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > On 12 April 2011 17:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Colebourne >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> The [collections] KeyValue class was a mistake. [lang] Pair is a >> > >> better more general concept. >> > >> >> > >> The only thing I'd consider with [lang] Pair now is whether it should >> > >> move to its own package, in case it grows later (primitive versions). >> > >> >> > > >> > > oacl.tuple? >> > >> > +1 >> >> Gary >> >> >> > If we create a package, that would be the name I'd choose. >> > Stephen >> > Refactored, now in SVN. Gary > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Gary >> >> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >> http://garygregory.com/ >> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
