Le 27/04/2011 13:50, sebb a écrit : > On 27 April 2011 12:56, Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Was it decided to use >> @version $Id$ >> instead of >> @version $Revision$ $Date$ >> ? > > Or even > > @version $Revision$ > > So long as we don't use $Date$ I don't care > >> If so, the corresponding check in "checkstyle.xml" must be changed.
I'm not sure we concluded. $Id$ seemed to be the choice of more people. Either way, we can adapt checkstyle. Luc >> >> >> Regards, >> Gilles >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
