On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> These are the current blocking items in play afaik: >> >> * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable? > > Sounds like this is now: > > * Update javadoc for Mutable classes to indicate that they can't do > much to make them useful in String.format. > > We could consider making Fraction, StopWatch and others use Format > under the hood and thus implementing Formattable, but I'm not sure I > see much point. I also don't see adding Formattable later on as a > backwards compat issue, but maybe I'm being dim (flu + newborn, > verrrrry dim right now).
Note, I don't consider either of these to be required for 3.0. I've documented the javadoc as LANG-698 and the consideration of adding Formattable as LANG-699. >> * LANG-696/Email thread - getShortName. What to do with the (String) >> variant. Remove others. > > I've updated LANG-696. I think we need to decide which of the following we > want: > > getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Entry" [Matches JVM] > getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Map.Entry" [Matches Lang 2.x] I think we should think more on this (i.e. post 3.0) and it's not the end of the world to be stuck with getSimpleName until 4.0. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
