sounds reasonable, +1 Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Phil Steitz <[email protected]> wrote: > As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few > Commons proper components that are no longer under active > development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant" > classification on the web site to include components that have had > releases. I am not sure whether we need to distinguish internally > within this group or do svn moves. I will start by proposing just > the minimalist approach: > > 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE. A single -1 > suffices to postpone the action; but a -1 in a dormancy vote is > really a +1 to help sustain or advance the component. > > 1) When a component is voted "dormant": > a) the main web site and site navigation links show the component > as dormant > b) the component site and component JIRA page display a "dormant > disclaimer" (TBD) > c) JIRA remains open > d) svn remains open (maybe made read only? Could just agree to > no commits.) > > 2) To revive a component requires another VOTE resulting in 3 +1s > from ASF committers interested in bringing the zombie back to life. > > Phil > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
