+1 I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI frameworks
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit : >>> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in >>> current or >>> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. >>> >>> Any objections? >> >> Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was >> introduced in Java 1.4 (with java.beans.XMLEncoder/Decoder) ? >> >> I don't think DBCP should be tied to a serialization format, so +1 >> for removing this part in DBCP 2. > > It is really a configuration specification language. See > *http://s.apache.org/vT. > > Phil > * >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
