Hi Paul! yes I agree, according to Joerg's suggestion, version should be 4.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
@Joerg: absolutely right, thanks for your help!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > Would you guys be willing to start at 4.0-SNAPSHOT so there's a direct > continuation of versioning? Just a novel thought since it might help > others to see it's not a re-invention of OGNL, per se, but the > continuation of it. > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> On May 11, 2011, at 9:36, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd be inclined to keep the current package name and Maven ids during >>>> (most of) incubation. >>> >>> Disagreed. Changing package names etc. should be the first steps in >>> incubation. As should be the publication of an early release with the >>> new package names. This allows end users to pick up as soon as >>> possible while still be upwards compatible. >> >> +1 >> Gary >> >>> >>> If you don't do that, then users might prefer to wait "until the major >>> change is done". >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
