Hi,
what's your policy regarding prefixing the name of abstract classes
with "Abstract"? I got the feeling that if there is an underlying
interface, then you add the "abstract"
public interface Foo{...}
public abstract class AbstractFoo{} implements FooHow about abstract classes which do not implement an interface? Should we call them Foo or AbstractFoo. Example: should RealLinearOperator really be called AbstractRealLinearOperator? Thanks, S --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
