On 12 August 2011 08:14, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO unless the main package name has to change due to binary > incompatibilities in the new version I would stick to the original > groupId/artifactId (ie org.apache.jcs/jcs).
+1, otherwise users will be forced to edit and recompile - such changes effectively make it a new component. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 12/08/2011 08:41, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> while looking through the Gump setup for JCS I realized the artifactId >> inside the POM had been changed to commons-jcs while the groupId still >> is org.apache.jcs. Does it make sense to keep the old groupId when >> you change the artifactId anyway? >> >> Stefan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
