What about simply bumping the reqs to java 5?

Gary

On Aug 28, 2011, at 13:46, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/28/11 3:51 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.7 based
>> on the first RC.
>>
>> Tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/
>>
>> Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/maven/
>>
>> Site: http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/site/
>>
>> [ ] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>
>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> The release notes (which are very nice, btw) say that 1.3 compat has
> been dropped, but the site says 1.4 is still supported.  I get the
> following compile error when I try to compile using 1.4 (under Ant)
> [javac] bad class file:
> /home/psteitz/.m2/repository/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2/2.0/commons-vfs2-2.0.jar(org/apache/commons/vfs2/FileObject.class)
>    [javac] class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0
>    [javac] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct
> subdirectory of the classpath.
>    [javac] import org.apache.commons.vfs2.FileObject;
>
> The Ant build did not work for me out of the box either.  It should
> probably be either replaced with a working Ant build or removed.  It
> tries to pull release versions of dependencies from the apache
> snapshots repo and it also looks for JUNIT in ANT_HOME.  To get it
> to work, I removed the unless key on the test goal, and relied on
> the fact that all deps were already in my local repo.
>
> Other than these issues, the release looks great.  Could be the
> first issue is OK for runtime use, as long as whoever is using the
> component under 1.4 pulls in a compatible VFS if this is used.  But
> it looks like VFS is a required (not test only) dependency, so
> unless I am missing something, this means you can't build from
> source under 1.4.  Does the maven 1.4 profile work here?  Sorry I
> did not test that.
>
> Phil
>
>
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to