On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all guys, > I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level, > there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces > methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it? > > Moreover, I'd like to propose to split the chain component, for v2.0, > in a multi-module project: > > - core APIs; > - XML configuration APIs (depends from Digester); > - servlet (depends from Servlet APIs); > - portlet (depends from Portlet APIs); > - faces (depends from Faces APIs). > > in that way users interested on core APIs only don't need to bring > unused code; that looks to me a cleaner common approach used in > various projects inside the ASF (cocoon3, for example) and outside > (i.e. slf4j). What's your opinion about it? >
+1 to all Matt > Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Simone Tripodi > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> sorry I'm late but looks like my local timezone sometimes doesn't >> allow me replying promptly :P >> >> @Matt: you are welcome, any time :) Unfortunately I'm not so familiar >> with [chain] codebase, I cannot be useful ATM :( >> >> @Elijah: patches are always welcome ;) For those tests that seems >> generic, replacing the empty generics with Object should be the trick, >> or not? >> >> Have a nice day, all the best!!! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@zupancic.name> >> wrote: >>> Hi Simo, >>> >>> Before we look at releasing the changes (after a trunk merge), I think that >>> we will need to update the documentation to include Generics and possibly >>> change the unit tests to use Generics. That said - I'm cautious about >>> changing the unit tests because they are verifying that the API works in its >>> current form without generics. Do you or anyone else have any thoughts on >>> this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Elijah >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi >>> <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all guys, >>>> I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site >>>> on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that >>>> Elijah kindly provided. >>>> WDYT? It is IMHO acceptable in order to apply the modifications in /trunk. >>>> TIA, all the best!!! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simone Tripodi >>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > Hi Matt, >>>> > your suggestion makes indeed a lot of sense! I'll copy the /trunk to a >>>> > branch and publish the site, once applied the patch, on my home@asf as >>>> > soon as I have spare time today, so we can discuss together clirr >>>> > report results. >>>> > Many thanks for your hint, have a nice day!!! >>>> > Simo >>>> > >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> > http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> I am generally in favor. I think it could be good to apply his patch >>>> >> on a branch so we can discuss the clirr results and agree on the >>>> >> severity of the (IMHO forgivable) backward-compatibility breaches. >>>> >> Then we will understand the proper path forward with respect to >>>> >> versions and all the changes that cascade from the potential major >>>> >> version bump. >>>> >> >>>> >> Matt >>>> >> >>>> >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Simone Tripodi >>>> >> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>> Hi all guys, >>>> >>> Elijah, a [chain] user, has been submitting worthy contributions[1] to >>>> >>> improve and actualize the commons-chains component, providing also >>>> >>> patches[2]. >>>> >>> I think it is the good time to start speaking about the next [chain] >>>> >>> version (no new releases/development in the last months), any >>>> >>> objections on applying Elijah patch? >>>> >>> I can take care of it but please let me know if anyone else want to do. >>>> >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!! >>>> >>> Simo >>>> >>> >>>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ajh3sunrst7x5klv >>>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-53 >>>> >>> >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
