Hi Paul, agreed. I just started indeed a thread vote to accept the new codebase as /trunk, so we can continue working toward a new releas wich involves redesigns as well.
I would really appreciate if you and James partecipate in the vote and could continue co-operate until next release!!! Have a nice day, all the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Major versions don't need to keep compatibility. Even if it is > laudable goal to try, I rather have a better designed software and do > 30 minutes of upgrading code than keep dragging along old decisions. > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Raman Gupta <rocketra...@fastmail.fm> wrote: >> On 09/05/2011 08:51 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> I totally agree with you James, what is needed is just to understand >>> if break the 1.X compatibility or not... >>> I think that the discussion worths a vote call at that point, WDYT? >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> As a chain user, I'd be fine with that for 2.x: +1 non-binding. >> >> Cheers, >> Raman >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
