+1 :) On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 7 September 2011 19:26, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi All: >> > >> > The message for the exception thrown by Validate.isInstance does not >> mention >> > the actual type, only the expected type. >> > >> > Is there any objection to changing this? >> > >> > trunk: "The validated object is not an instance of %s" >> > >> > Proposal (1): "The validated object is expected to be an instance of %s, >> not >> > a %s" >> > >> > Or more succinctly (2): "Expected an instance of %s, got a %" >> > >> > Or more succinctly (3), a la JUnit: "Expected: %s, actual: %" >> > >> > Thoughts? >> >> (3) seems fine. >> > > Here are examples of what I have in my local sandbox (not in SVN yet): > > - isAssignableFrom: "Cannot assign a java.lang.String to a java.util.List > - isInstance: "Expected type: java.util.List, actual: java.lang.String" > > Tracking here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-751 > > Gary > > >> >> > Gary >> > >> > >> > -- >> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://s.apache.org/rl >> > Spring Batch in Action: http://s.apache.org/HOq >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://s.apache.org/rl > Spring Batch in Action: http://s.apache.org/HOq > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
