Done in r1173788. Sébastien 2011/9/21 Phil Steitz <[email protected]>: > On 9/21/11 5:23 AM, sebb wrote: >> Why not just add some text to the tag to explain what has happened? >> >> Something like: >> >> @since 2.0 (changed to concrete class in 3.0) > > +1 > > Phil >> >> 2011/9/21 Sébastien Brisard <[email protected]>: >>> Maybe that tag should be removed (drastic... but no possible confusion!). >>> Sébastien >>> >>> 2011/9/21 Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]>: >>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:25:13AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I'm currently working on MATH-662. So far, I have merged >>>>> CholeskyDecomposition and CholeskyDecompositionImpl. My question is >>>>> very simple: CholeskyDecomposition exists as an interface since >>>>> version 2.0 (as indicated in the current Javadoc), but as a concrete >>>>> class since version 3.0 only. Should the @since tag be updated >>>>> accordingly? >>>> In fact, it depends on whether this tag is intended for tracking the >>>> functionality or the implementation. >>>> And either action could be misleading... >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Gilles >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
