Hi Niall + Gary, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> Good day to you all: >>> >>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote >>> because I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.) >>> >>> Tag: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC3/ >>> >>> Site: >>> >>> https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC3/ >>> >>> Binaries: >>> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-002/commons- >> io/commons-io/2.1/ >>> >>> [ ] +1 release it >>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care >>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because >> >> [snip] >> >> -1: RELEASE-NOTES.txt is old >> >> >> IBM JDK 1.6.0.9 (amd64) fails: >> ================ %< ================ >> Failed tests: >> testUTF16WithSingleByteWrite(org.apache.commons.io.output.WriterOutputStreamTest): >> expected:<[à peine arrivés nous entrâmes dans sa chambre]> but was:<[ >> 瀀攀椀渀 攀 愀爀爀椀瘀猀 渀漀甀猀 攀渀琀爀洀攀猀 搀愀渀猀 猀愀 挀栀愀洀戀爀]> >> ================ %< ================ >> >> Don't know what happens exactly. According javadoc "UTF-16" should >> default to "UTF-16BE" when no BOM is written. Might be a JDK bug. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-253 I knew, I've seen it before ... I've updated the issue. > Sorry, going on holiday so I don't have time to review - but thanks > for doing the release. Actually, my -1 is only because of the outdated RELEASE-NOTES. Since 2 out of 3 JDK 6 versions pass this test, I rather blame the particular JDK. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
