Thanks for the link! It seems very interesting, I'll give it a try! Sébastien
2011/10/4 Axel <axel...@gmail.com>: > 2011/10/3 Sébastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>: >> Hello, >> I'm using quite extensively the Field/FieldElement interfaces, but am >> sometimes feeling the need for less stringent sets like Abelian Groups >> (no multiplication) and Rings (no division). This would allow me to >> carry out some calculations on different types of number simply by >> changing the generic type. >> I was thinking of adding some interfaces along the lines of the two >> above mentioned >> - AbelianGroup<T>, AbelianGroupElement<T>, >> - Ring<T>, RingElement<T>. > Hello > > You should probably take a look at the JAS type hierachy (see attached > jas_hierarchy.png) > http://krum.rz.uni-mannheim.de/jas/ > > this paper gives an overview of the JAS design: > http://krum.rz.uni-mannheim.de/kredel/ca-sem-2009.pdf > > -- > Axel Kramer > http://code.google.com/p/symja/wiki/UsedLibraries (JAS and CM examples in > Symja) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
