On 2 December 2011 14:14, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > Just a simple question to Sebb; > Do you intend to pursue and release 2.1 or just leave it as is?
Yes, I would like 2.1 to be released. Given that there appear to be some binary incompatibilies that cannot be resolved without losing much recent work and bug fixes, I think it might be an idea to discuss the remaining Clirr errors on the dev list prior to creating another RC. No point cutting the RC if there is no agreement that the incompatibilities are acceptable; also probably easier to discuss as a separate issue from the formal vote. There are a few loose ends to tie up - including incorporating your Javadoc corrections - but I think it will then be ready for the Clirr discussion. I'm happy to take it to that stage, as I have already done most of investigation and fixes (and they are mostly already in my workspace). At that point, you or I or anyone else can act as RM for the next round of formal voting. Does that sound like a good plan to you? > Regards, > Henrib > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/JEXL-Jexl-2-1-tp4147180p4147180.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
