On 4 December 2011 18:46, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > > sebb-2-2 wrote >> >> Don't know if this is an indication that the unit tests are incomplete >> or that there is not really a use case for implementing the interface, >> (other than the implementations which are already supplied.) >> > I don't think anyone would implement the Script interface without deriving / > delegating to an ExpressionImpl which is internal (by transitivity from the > protected ASTJexlScript member); so it'b be someone trying to extend Jexl > capabilities. > Jexl being usually featured and used as a glue / joint, JEXL Scripts are > usually used as classes members thus implementing Script is very unlikely.
OK, thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
