2012/2/17 Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com>: > Hi @all, > > just some status/feedback on some still open issues: > > - MATH-449: I have implemented (almost) all suggestions from > Phil, and the code is documented and tested, so imho the issue > can be resolved unless somebody has still reservations > > - MATH-431: the two tests were contributed by Mikkel Meyer Andersen > (is he still active?) and I have cleaned up the exceptions while > working on another issue. There are still things to do, as can be > seen in the comments to the issue (mainly the results are not 100% > equivalent to R due to some specific corrections). I do not have > the expertise to work on them myself straight away. How do we proceed > in such a case? Keep them as they are and note the differences > in the javadoc, or remove them unless the issues are completely > resolved? > > Cheers, > > Thomas
Dear all, I am still active in theory, but in practise I unfortunately haven't contributed much lately due to high workload on my PhD. I am of course sorry for this and hope to be able to highen my activity. Regarding MATH-431, we need to discuss if we should adopt some of the changes R makes and find references for all these. I am on holiday next week, but I will be back in one week and would love to participate in the discussion. Meanwhile I would love some views on whether to adopt the changes or not. Personally, I am fine with noticing in the code for 3.0 release that some corrections can be made and refer to some (e.g. from R) but none are implemented yet. Cheers, Mikkel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
