On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-03-31, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Before ages when I wrote the "ChangeSet" stuff I have marked them as >> "experimental". Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss >> if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably >> after 1.4? > > I must admit I've never used that API, so I don't know whether it could > use some tweaks. > > OTOH I don't recall any JIRA raised against it in the three years they > are part of Compress. Either nobody uses the classes or the API looks > good as it is. > > Personally I intend (but you know what happens to good intentions when > time is limited) to kick off a Compress 2.0 API discussion after the 1.4 > release - generics, some improvements as well as getting rid of some > backwards compatibility baggage.
I agree, but whats the conclusion? :-) Wait for 2.0? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
