On 30 April 2012 22:49, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Apr 30 21:49:44 2012
> New Revision: 1332423
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332423&view=rev
> Log:
> Typo
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java?rev=1332423&r1=1332422&r2=1332423&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> ---
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
> (original)
> +++
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
> Mon Apr 30 21:49:44 2012
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ public class GenericKeyedObjectPool<K,T>
> !evictionKeyIterator.hasNext()) {
> List<K> keyCopy = new ArrayList<K>();
> Lock lock = keyLock.readLock();
Perhaps rename as readLock rather than the generic lock?
Makes it clearer that the following code is only read-protected.
Similarly elsewhere for writeLock.
> - lock .lock();
> + lock.lock();
> try {
> keyCopy.addAll(poolKeyList);
> } finally {
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
