Well, you might want the logging to be silent during normal testing but to be enabled if problems arise.
Ralph On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > Can anyone provide a reason [classscan] should not simply use > slf4j-simple in the test scope rather than logback? It's a small > change, but any reduction in complexity... > > Matt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
