On 28 June 2012 19:23, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:53 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> >> >> >> If we want SANSELAN deleted later we will need to raise a new JIRA. >> >> >> > >> > Good, no need to loose the old info now. >> >> ?!? All issues have been moved, so the JIRA is empty ... >> > > Well, its bye bye then ;)
I decided to ask for SANSELAN to be made read-only, rather than deleting it, so that users will see the redirection notice on the Summary page. Clearly at least one user thinks/thought SANSELAN was still active, otherwise they would not have raised 3 issues there recently. But feel free to organise for Infra to delete it if you really want. > G > > >> >> - Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
