Commons Collections has an LRUMap class that we could "borrow", perhaps?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > guten morgen Bene, > > I have not a strong opinion about it, I am convinced anyway that the > original BU authors (BU2 at the beginning was a tentative to refurbish > BU) adopted the WeakHashMap NOT with the purpose of implementing a > `cache` in the strict sense we are used to. We should go back to the > ML history and find related discussions about it to understand that > decision. > > If we need to switch implementation, in Apache Cocoon we developed a > simple LRU cache hacking the LinkedHashMap, we could import and adapt > that version - it would be better keeping BU2 dependencies-less. > > Thanks, > -Simo > > [1] http://s.apache.org/9zN > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Benedikt Ritter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just came across this post: >> http://www.codeinstructions.com/2008/09/weakhashmap-is-not-cache-understanding.html >> Now i'm wondering what you think about it, since we are using the >> WeakHashMap for BU2. Maybe we should be looking for an alternative >> caching mechanism? >> Any suggestions? >> >> Best regards, >> Benedikt >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
